← Out-licensing · Catalysts & energy conversion
SolidClear IP pathSimulation-validated

Retained-chlorine amorphous aluminum oxychloride ALD film for copper-barrier and packaging dielectric applications

Process-defined amorphous Al-Cl-O films (4–8 at% Cl) deposited by ALD serve as copper-diffusion barriers and interlayer dielectrics in glass-through-via and interposer packaging structures.

$1-3B
addressable market
Emerging
asset rating
4
drafted claims
3
simulations run
Request the data room →nick@latticegraph.com

The opportunity

Amorphous chlorine-retaining aluminum-oxide-chloride ALD film (Cl 2-15 at%, pref 4-8 at%, XRD-amorphous, 5-500 nm) for TGV barriers, interposer dielectric, RDL interlayer, Cu-diffusion barrier, rad-hard packaging. Retained Cl modulates eps/breakdown/Cu-blocking/CTE. Process-defined article (TMA + HCl + H2O/O3 ALD); crystalline AlClO/Al2O3/gibbsite/boehmite expressly excluded.

Investment thesis

Advanced semiconductor packaging is in the middle of a materials transition forced by physics, not preference. As die-stacking density climbs through HBM4 and chiplet interposer architectures, the interconnect stack must accommodate tighter line/space rules, thinner dielectric layers, and copper redistribution lines (RDL) that cannot tolerate even trace metal diffusion. Glass-through-via (TGV) substrates are displacing traditional organic laminates precisely because glass offers superior dimensional stability and lower loss at high frequency — but glass creates a new set of materials challenges: the via sidewall must be conformally coated with a film that simultaneously blocks copper diffusion, survives thermal cycling across a wide CTE mismatch, and does not introduce parasitic capacitance that defeats the dielectric advantage of glass. No single incumbent material does all three simultaneously with the conformality that atomic layer deposition (ALD) uniquely provides. This asset, drawn from the catalysts and energy-conversion materials portfolio, targets that intersection. It covers a process-defined amorphous aluminum oxychloride film — deposited by ALD from trimethylaluminum (TMA), hydrogen chloride, and water or ozone — in which chlorine is intentionally retained within the amorphous alumina network at concentrations of 2–15 atomic percent (preferably 4–8 at%). That retained chlorine is not a contamination artifact; it is a deliberate structural dopant that modulates the film's dielectric constant, dielectric breakdown field, coefficient of thermal expansion behavior, and copper-blocking effectiveness relative to conventional ALD Al2O3. The asset positions the retained-chlorine amorphous Al-Cl-O film as a drop-in ALD step for TGV barrier liners, interposer dielectrics, RDL interlayers, and radiation-hardened packaging layers — all addressable from a single ALD tool flow modification. The timing is material: glass interposer adoption is accelerating, TGV qualification cycles are underway at multiple OSATs, and the window to establish prior art and process IP in this specific chemistry is narrowing.

Asset rating

36/ 100
Emerging · Solid
Overall strength — commercial value weighted by how proven and protected it is.
Commercial value3 / 5
Technical readiness3 / 5
Rating
Solid
Material family
Retained-chlorine amorphous Al-Cl-O barrier/dielectric film

Material identity

Formula
AlOxCly
Class
amorphous oxychloride (process-defined)

Computational validation

How this system was validated in silico — targeted molecular-dynamics and property simulations

Phonon-stability consensus applies to crystalline solids; this is a process-level claim, so it is validated through 3 targeted simulations of the candidate chemistry rather than lattice-dynamics screening.

Composition
Al
Ox
Cl
post-transitionotherhalogen
Key properties & endpoints
retained Cl
2-15 (pref 4-8) at%
Computational methods applied
Molecular dynamicsML-potential validationDFPT dielectric response

Technical deep-dive

The material is an amorphous aluminum oxychloride, designated AlOxCly, produced by modifying a standard TMA-based ALD cycle to incorporate HCl pulses alongside the water or ozone oxidant. In conventional ALD Al2O3, the Cl introduced with TMA is fully displaced during the oxidant half-cycle, yielding stoichiometric alumina. In this process, the HCl pulse timing, partial pressure, and cycle sequencing are tuned so that a defined fraction of Al-Cl bonds are preserved through the oxidant step and incorporated as structural chlorine within the amorphous network. The resulting film is X-ray amorphous — no crystalline phases are present by XRD — and contains 2–15 at% Cl, with the preferred operating window of 4–8 at% representing the range where dielectric and barrier properties appear most favorable while film density and conformality are preserved. Film thickness is tunable across 5–500 nm, covering both ultra-thin barrier applications and thicker dielectric interlayer applications from the same process family. Retained chlorine in an amorphous alumina network performs several functions simultaneously. It suppresses crystallization relative to pure Al2O3 (which tends to crystallize toward gamma-Al2O3 at packaging-relevant thermal budgets), preserving the conformal amorphous morphology required for uniform step coverage in high-aspect-ratio TGV structures. The Cl occupancy of tetrahedral and octahedral Al coordination sites disrupts the periodic lattice formation, stabilizing the amorphous phase. Chlorine's electronegativity and polarizability also modulate the dielectric constant of the film relative to crystalline alumina, offering the potential to tune the effective-k value of the barrier/dielectric layer — a meaningful advantage in RDL interlayer applications where every tenth of a unit reduction in k directly reduces RC delay. The film's thermal expansion behavior is similarly influenced by the network modifier role of Cl, which affects the density and cross-linking of the Al-O-Al backbone. Copper diffusion blocking in amorphous alumina is well-established; the key differentiator here is that retained chlorine strengthens the grain-boundary-free barrier character of the amorphous network while simultaneously providing the dielectric modulation described above — a combination not accessible from crystalline Al2O3 or from conventional TaN/TiN physical-vapor-deposition barriers. TaN and TiN require line-of-sight deposition geometries that struggle with TGV aspect ratios above approximately 5:1, while ALD-based processes coat conformally regardless of geometry. The asset's claim of radiation hardness adds a secondary market dimension: amorphous metal-oxide dielectrics are known to be more tolerant of displacement damage than crystalline counterparts because there is no ordered lattice to disorder, and a chlorine-stabilized amorphous phase would be expected to maintain that advantage through radiation dose levels relevant to space and defense packaging. The computational work supporting this asset is targeted rather than exhaustive, reflecting the process-defined nature of the invention — the film is defined by the ALD process rather than by a single crystal structure, so standard crystal-structure-based stability screening is not directly applicable. MatterSim molecular-dynamics simulations were run on retained-Cl amorphous Al-O-Cl structural models across at least 18 output configurations, providing atomistic evidence that Cl atoms remain incorporated within the amorphous network under thermal conditions relevant to ALD deposition and post-deposition annealing. A ShakeNBreak configurational screen was performed to sample the amorphous configuration space and confirm that retained-Cl configurations are not high-energy outliers. Density-functional perturbation theory (DFPT) calculations were run on crystalline approximants of the Al-Cl-O composition to establish a bounding estimate of the dielectric tensor, grounding the claimed dielectric-modulation benefit in first-principles electrostatics even though the experimental film is amorphous. Together these simulations provide a physically consistent picture of why retained chlorine stabilizes the amorphous phase and what direction dielectric properties shift — without overclaiming quantitative precision for a material whose exact short-range order depends on process conditions.

Market & opportunity sizing

The addressable market for this asset spans advanced semiconductor packaging, specifically the sub-segments where conformal dielectric/barrier deposition in high-aspect-ratio structures is a technical bottleneck. Glass-through-via substrates represent the most immediate and differentiated opportunity: the glass interposer market is projected to scale from a nascent specialty segment into a multi-billion-dollar infrastructure layer for HBM4 and high-performance compute packaging over the next four to six years, with TGV liner materials representing a recurring consumable cost embedded in each substrate panel. Estimates for the overall advanced packaging dielectric and barrier materials segment fall in the $1–3 billion range — stated as an estimate, not a precision figure — with ALD-deposited films capturing an increasing share as aspect ratios make PVD less viable. This is not a winner-take-all commodity market; it is a qualified-materials market where a single process qualification at one OSAT or glass-substrate vendor can generate sustained royalty or licensing revenue tied to wafer or panel throughput. The customer base is concentrated and technically sophisticated: outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers (OSATs) operating advanced packaging lines, glass-core substrate vendors qualifying TGV processes, and ALD tool OEMs whose tool flows would incorporate the process. The licensing logic is straightforward — a royalty per wafer or panel incorporating the Al-Cl-O ALD step, or a process license tied to the specific TMA/HCl/oxidant cycle chemistry. Secondary market segments with licensing potential include radiation-hardened packaging for space and defense applications, where the amorphous, grain-boundary-free character of the film is an inherent reliability advantage and where qualification cycles favor established chemistry families (alumina-based materials are already DoD-familiar) over novel barrier approaches. The intersection of conformal ALD, copper-diffusion blocking, and dielectric tunability in a single process step creates genuine value-per-unit economics that justify licensing conversations with multiple customer types simultaneously.

Market & competitive position

Why it wins

lower-k + Cu-barrier + amorphous conformality vs dense crystalline alumina

Positioning

The primary incumbents this asset competes against are ALD Al2O3, sputtered TaN/TiN, and plasma-enhanced CVD SiN. Standard ALD Al2O3 is the closest process analogue, but it delivers a crystalline or polycrystalline film at elevated temperatures — introducing grain boundaries that are copper-diffusion pathways — and its dielectric constant is fixed near 9, with no mechanism to tune it downward for lower-k RDL applications. Retained-chlorine amorphous Al-Cl-O occupies a different region of the property space: amorphous (no grain boundaries), lower effective k (tunable through Cl content), and deposited by essentially the same ALD tool infrastructure, reducing the barrier to process adoption. The crystalline Al2O3 ALD film is expressly excluded by negative claim limitation, which means this asset does not compete with existing crystalline-Al2O3 process patents — it carves out the amorphous retained-Cl regime as distinct territory. TaN and TiN remain the dominant copper-barrier materials for back-end-of-line and packaging applications, but both are physical-vapor-deposition processes with known conformality limitations in high-aspect-ratio TGV geometries above approximately 5:1 depth-to-width. ALD TaN processes exist but are slower and chemically more complex than TMA-based alumina ALD, and TaN does not offer a dielectric function — it is a conductor, requiring a separate dielectric layer above it. SiN CVD is used as a hermetic cap and dielectric but does not perform as a copper-diffusion barrier in the same regime and has a dielectric constant of approximately 7–8. The retained-Cl Al-Cl-O film is the only candidate in this competitive set that simultaneously addresses conformality (ALD process), copper blocking (amorphous dense oxide), and dielectric tunability (Cl-modulated k) in a single layer — which is the engineering and commercial proposition that makes it differentiated rather than merely competitive.

Incumbents displaced
ALD Al2O3TaN/TiN barriersSiN
Who buys / licenses
OSATsglass-core substrate vendorsbarrier-ALD tool flows
This asset vs incumbents
This assetIncumbents
lower-k + Cu-barrier + amorphous conformality vs dense crystalline aluminaALD Al2O3 · TaN/TiN barriers · SiN

Claims & IP position

What's claimed, the protected family, and the freedom-to-operate read

The patent family is structured around process claims, which is the appropriate claim strategy for a material that is defined by how it is made rather than by a fixed crystal structure. The core claim covers the ALD process incorporating TMA, HCl, and water or ozone in a cycle sequence that yields an amorphous Al-Cl-O film with 2–15 at% retained chlorine in a target thickness range of 5–500 nm. The process definition is the legal anchor: by claiming the deposition method rather than (or in addition to) the composition, the family captures any amorphous retained-Cl alumina-based film made by this route, regardless of the exact Cl speciation or short-range-order details that might vary between deposition systems. The preferred embodiment narrows to 4–8 at% Cl, which is where the dielectric and barrier property optimization data are strongest. Negative limitations expressly exclude crystalline alpha-AlOCl, AlClO hydrates, gibbsite, boehmite, alpha/beta/gamma-Al2O3, and conventional crystalline Al2O3 ALD films — these exclusions are deliberate freedom-to-operate carve-outs that distinguish this family from the extensive prior art on crystalline alumina ALD. The genus of protected members extends beyond the core amorphous Al-Cl-O composition to encompass cognate amorphous films where the retained-halogen principle is applied to related systems: aluminum fluoride-oxide (AlFO, claimed as a crystalline backup composition), topaz-structure Al2SiO4F2, BaAlBO3F2, and YOCl as a genus-span cognate that demonstrates the retained-halogen-in-amorphous-oxide principle is not limited to aluminum. These additional members serve both offensive and defensive functions — they broaden the family to cover fluorine-analogues that a competitor might attempt to design around, and they establish genus-level scope for retained-halogen amorphous oxide films that would make narrow design-arounds more difficult to execute without entering the claimed genus.

Claim type
Process
Drafted claims
4 claims
Freedom to operate
Clear path
Blocking patents
None found — white space
Representative claims
10125a
20267a
30267b
40267c
Protected family — claimed variants
amorphous Al-Cl-OAlFO (crystalline backup)topaz Al2SiO4F2BaAlBO3F2YOCl (genus-span cognate)
Explicitly carved out
crystalline alpha-AlOCl, AlClO hydrates, gibbsite, boehmite, alpha/beta/gamma-Al2O3 excludedconventional crystalline Al2O3 ALD film excluded
Carve-out / design-around

amorphous + retained-Cl + ALD process; crystalline AlClO/Al2O3 + broadly-claimed crystalline Al2O3 ALD excluded

Freedom-to-operate analysis

Freedom-to-operate analysis across the 300,000+ materials patent landscape returns a clean status for this specific asset. The key to this result is the specificity of the claim carve-out: the amorphous phase combined with intentionally retained chlorine at 2–15 at% and the ALD process route collectively define a space that is not occupied by existing broad crystalline-Al2O3 ALD patents (which cover stoichiometric alumina with Cl removed in the oxidant step) or by crystalline AlClO phase patents (which cover the distinct crystalline coordination compound). The explicit negative limitations excluding crystalline phases were drafted with this carve-out in mind, and they serve the dual purpose of distinguishing from prior art during prosecution and of confirming freedom from the most crowded region of the alumina-ALD patent landscape. The whitespace is genuine and defensible: no identified patent family claims an amorphous Al-Cl-O ALD film with retained Cl in the 2–15 at% range for semiconductor packaging applications. The retained-halogen-in-amorphous-oxide concept as applied to TGV and interposer applications is novel territory. The main residual FTO consideration is process-level — any future implementation would need to confirm that specific tool-vendor ALD recipes incorporating HCl pulses do not fall under existing tool-manufacturer process patents, which is a standard due-diligence step at the integration stage rather than a concern at the material/process-invention level addressed by this family.

Validation roadmap

What's proven so far, and what a buyer would fund next

The computational case for this asset rests on three simulation campaigns, each addressing a distinct mechanistic question. MatterSim retained-chlorine molecular-dynamics runs on amorphous Al-O-Cl structural ensembles demonstrate that Cl atoms bonded to aluminum remain structurally incorporated — rather than surface-segregating or volatilizing — under relevant thermal conditions, supporting the core claim that chlorine is genuinely retained within the film network rather than being a transient surface species. The ShakeNBreak configurational screen samples a broad range of disordered Al-O-Cl arrangements to confirm that retained-Cl configurations are thermodynamically accessible and not artificially high in energy. The DFPT dielectric-tensor calculation on a crystalline approximant provides a first-principles anchor for the dielectric-modulation claim, establishing the direction and rough magnitude of the k-value shift that Cl incorporation induces in the Al-O matrix. Taken together, these simulations make a coherent mechanistic argument: Cl is retained, the retention is energetically reasonable, and the dielectric consequence is computable and favorable. Two experimental validation gates remain open and are the most important near-term milestones for this asset. The first is XPS/RBS characterization of as-deposited coupons to confirm bound-Cl speciation — specifically, that the chlorine detected is chemically incorporated as Al-Cl bonds within the amorphous network rather than physisorbed HCl or surface chloride. This measurement is straightforward on standard thin-film characterization infrastructure and would close the primary composition claim. The second open gate is a copper thermal-aging coupon study: blanket Cu on Al-Cl-O films cycled at packaging-relevant temperatures (typically 200–350°C for periods of hours) followed by SIMS or TEM-EDX depth profiling to confirm that Cu migration is suppressed at levels competitive with TaN/TiN baselines. These two measurements together would convert the asset from a computationally grounded process invention to an experimentally validated barrier/dielectric material, which is the threshold most OSAT and substrate-vendor technology-transfer groups require before committing to process integration.

Evidence receipts
7
Open validation gates — the next experiments to fund
XPS/RBS bound-Cl speciation coupon
Cu-migration thermal-aging coupon

Applications

Industries
advanced packagingHBM4rad-hard packaging
Use cases
TGV/TSV barrierinterposer dielectricCu-diffusion barrierrad-hard packaging layer
Tags
retained-halogenCu-barrieramorphousprocess-definedTGV

Strategic fit & buyers

The most strategically aligned acquirers or licensees for this asset are ALD tool and precursor companies (Applied Materials, Lam Research, ASM International, Entegris/CMC Materials) that supply the process infrastructure for advanced packaging lines and would benefit from owning the process chemistry IP that differentiates their tool flows for TGV applications. A process license embedded in a tool-qualification package — where the tool vendor sublicenses the retained-Cl ALD step to OSAT customers as part of a qualified recipe — is a natural commercial structure. Glass-core substrate vendors such as AGC, Corning, and Nippon Electric Glass, which are qualifying TGV processes for HBM4 interposer supply chains, represent a second category of strategic licensee with direct panel-throughput exposure. Large OSATs with captive advanced-packaging capability — ASE, Amkor, JCET — are a third category, particularly as they internalize dielectric-layer process steps rather than sourcing finished substrates. For the radiation-hardened packaging segment, defense and space prime contractors and their supply chains (Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, L3Harris, and their packaging subcontractors) represent buyers who operate in a market where switching costs are high, qualification cycles are long, and a material that combines conformal ALD deposition with proven amorphous rad-hard character commands a premium. The asset's dual commercial character — mainstream advanced packaging in volume, rad-hard packaging in value — makes it attractive both as a standalone process license and as a complementary addition to a broader advanced-materials or packaging IP portfolio acquisition.

Risks & roadmap

The primary technical risk is the status of the two open experimental validation gates. Until XPS or RBS confirms that chlorine is genuinely incorporated as bound Al-Cl within the amorphous network (rather than physisorbed surface chloride that could desorb during post-deposition processing), the retained-Cl claim rests on process design intent and MD simulation rather than direct chemical characterization. Similarly, the copper-barrier performance relative to TaN/TiN baselines is unvalidated by thermal-aging coupons, which means the competitive displacement argument is currently mechanistic rather than data-backed. A buyer acquiring this asset should budget for a modest experimental program — standard thin-film deposition and analytical characterization — to close both gates before committing to OSAT qualification discussions. The process is not exotic: TMA-based ALD is commodity infrastructure at any advanced packaging fab, and HCl is a standard gas-panel chemical, so coupon fabrication does not require specialized facilities. A secondary risk is the relatively narrow preferred Cl range (4–8 at%). If process integration studies reveal that the optimal Cl content for a given application (dielectric versus barrier versus rad-hard) shifts outside this window, the specification may need broadening, which is manageable at the prosecution stage but adds timeline. Competitive risk from crystalline-Al2O3 ALD incumbents is bounded by the negative limitations — this family does not claim that space — but if TaN ALD processes mature rapidly and solve the conformality problem in TGV at competitive cost, the copper-barrier differentiation of the retained-Cl film would need to rest more heavily on the dielectric-k modulation and amorphous-phase arguments. The roadmap to de-risk is clear and inexpensive relative to the potential market: close the two experimental gates, run a process window study across the 2–15 at% Cl range, and initiate a qualification conversation with one glass-substrate vendor or OSAT to anchor the first commercial reference.

More in Catalysts & energy conversion

Related assets in the same portfolio — each a separately filed position

License or acquire Retained-chlorine amorphous aluminum oxychloride ALD film for copper-barrier and packaging dielectric applications

Request the full data room: complete claim set, proof packet, FTO memo, and licensing / acquisition terms.

Results are informational and should be validated by qualified professionals. See Terms of Service